Purpose of Neurostatus e-Test Purpose of Neurostatus Training Historical Background Structure of EDSS ReferencesReferences
Amato MP, Fratiglioni L, Groppi C, et al. Interrater reliability in assessing functional systems and disability on the Kurtzke scale in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 1988; 45 (7): 746-48.
Amato MP, Ponziani G. Quantification of impairment in MS: discussion of the scales in use. Mult Scler 1999; 5 (4): 216-9.
Francis DA, Bain P, Swan AV, et al. An assessment of disability rating scales used in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 1991; 48 (3): 299-301.
Goodkin DE, Cookfair D, Wende K, et al. Inter- and intrarater scoring agreement using grades 1.0 to 3.5 of the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology 1992; 42 (4): 859-63.
Hobart J, Freeman J, Thompson A. Kurtzke scales revisited: the application of psychometric methods to clinical intuition. Brain 2000; 123: 1027-40.
Kurtzke JF, Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983; 33 (11): 1444-52.
Kurtzke JF, Natural history and clinical outcome measures for multiple sclerosis studies. Why at the present time does EDSS scale remain a preferred outcome measure to evaluate disease evolution? Neurol Sci 2000; 21 (6): 339-41.
Lechner-Scott J, Huber S, Kappos L. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Training for MS multi-center trials. J Neurol 1997; 244 Suppl. 3: S25.
Lechner-Scott J, Kappos L, Hofman M, et al. Can the Expanded Disability Status Scale be assessed by telephone? Mult Scler 2003; 9 (2): 154-9.
Noseworthy JH, Vandervoort MK, Wong CJ, et al. Interrater variability with the Expanded Disability Status Scales (EDSS) and Functional Systems (FS) in a multiple sclerosis clinical Trial. Neurology 1990; 40 (6): 971-5.